gamerhang.myfreeforum.org Forum Index gamerhang.myfreeforum.org
A place where like-minded individuals who are into all types of mediums, and not just video games, can come to communicate and create!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Catch 'Em All! Pokemon Thread
Page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    gamerhang.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> Video Game Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Please Register and Login to this forum to stop seeing this advertising.






Posted:     Post subject:

Back to top
Skybait J
Consistent Gamer
Consistent Gamer


Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 388


Location: Doin' LAUNDRY

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:37 pm    Post subject: Catch 'Em All! Pokemon Thread  Reply with quote

Ah, Pokemon. It was the only game I ever wanted when I was young. Gold and Silver actually came to America ON my birthday (same birthday I got my Gameboy Color). That was friggin kickass.

Okay, okay, this is teh Pokemons Thread, because I don't care who you are, EVERYONE plays the "real" Pokemon games when the come out, even those Halo/PC gamers in my class played em. One of em bought a DS JUST to play Diamond! I did kinda the same thing, now that I think of it....Why do I always get stations when the new Pokemon comes out? o.O Oh yeah, the awesomeness.

I'm starting to like the spinoffs a lot, though. I mean...I liked Pokemon Snap.... The "real" games are good, but I could give quite a few choices as to how they could totally make it better, like story could be expanded much, much more. Having two rivals is a start, but we need more! Of course anything drastically changed like that would just mean another spin off, but those are FUN, right?!

Wouldn't it be fun to play from a Gym Leader's perspective? Or have a semi-rookie grow up to be a Gym Leader or Breeder instead of just a "Pokemon Master". Or, why do all these guys start with no Pokemon? What if they had a lifetime partner Pokemon you could pick in the intro or something? You could Choose what type of pokemon you wanted to be in Gym Leader too...

....Anyone? Anyone? <.<
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
8-Bit
Crowned Gamer
Crowned Gamer


Joined: 20 Apr 2007
Posts: 54


Location: Chilly Beach

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

*Bursts onto the scene!*

I would have to agree, probably everyone has played the "real," Pokemon games.

Be a gym leader? It seems... Lacking in story. I mean, in Pokemon they jsut stand there wait, gathering dust until a trainer comes, beats them (or loses just to come back later) and gives out a bagde that says they beat you. So if you play as a gym leader I say it wouldn't be more then just standing there, then a battle every once and a while.

Choosing a Pokemon in the intro, which i think you mean pick the lowest form a type of Pokemon, kinda like the starter 3 in every game, except out of the entire roster of Pokemon, would be fun. I remeber linking up games and trading from our Blue and Red copies of the game so I could start with a different Pokemon, except the fatal flaw for my tactics was that the Pokemon were jerks and wouldn't listen to me so they got destroyed by Brock and other trainers.

Though choosing any Pokemon that would actually listen to you would be fun.

Random note- I've been needing a good game to play for car trips and since Pokemon has been the main source of my entertainment of those for some years, though lesser now. Would anyone who has played or owns Pokemon mystery dungeon for the GBA recommend it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skybait J
Consistent Gamer
Consistent Gamer


Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 388


Location: Doin' LAUNDRY

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's more to a Gym Leader's life than just stading around waiting for trainers. Think of the TV show and comics, they go around doing all kinds of things. Erica had a perfume shop, Koga was the evil sub-leader of Team Rocket (seriously), and Brock lived the life of a wanderer and only opened his gym once in a while.

What I was thinking of was that you were a low-level gym leader, and you had to proove yourself or simply make your gym worth its badge. Make your gym big, hire/earn disciple. Do your day to day thing around town or take a trip to catch more pokemon or see the world. Theres a possibility of a storyline where you have to beat various villains, and of course, beat the trainers that come in. Throw in full custimization abilities and you got yourself one hell of a great game.

I know I think it'd be an awesome idea....

I heard Mystery Dungeon was supposed to be pretty good from a couple people, but I don't know how old they were aqnd I havn't tried the game myself. In that same train of thought, how good was Pokemon Ranger? That's something I've wanted to try for a while.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Onasaki
Crowned Gamer
Crowned Gamer


Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 63


Location: Anywhere.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mystery dungeon is pretty chilidish. And it gets boring pretty fast. The claim there's suposed to be some sort of tactical advantage in the battles. But it's nothing but a Final Fantasy Adventure-esque battle. Using items is so damn annoying you'd be dead before you could finish up the battle. Now if they had made it for a better console rather then DS then It'd probably be a damn cool game. But that's my opinion. I've never played Pokemon ranger meself, I've seen stuff in magazines about it. It looks pretty boring, but eh. The newer pokemon, Pearl and Diamond are basicly derrived from the originals. Big evil team plotting to tkae over the world. Gotta stop them and while your at it kill a few gym leaders. And The one dude is right, being a gym leader would be rather boring. the never do anything, just stand there. "I am the water gym leader! All my pokemon are water type! You know their type, meaning you know their weakness. Kill me and end my sad sad thing I call a life!"

Etc etc. I wish they would make a cooler version of the originals for larger consoles where the travel isn't map-based.

Sure, The gamecube versions of the pokemon games were pretty neat But the game was based around some sort of arena or the travel was map-based. Where you select a friggin destination from some menu, which has always annoyed the hell out of me. I feel so confined around a map based system. I want to be able to wander around like Ash fighting random people catching pokemon and having delusions of being a pokemon master with a voice that could open a can.

Seriously, when are they going to make a damn game that's based off the shows. Rather then following the SAME DAMN storyline over and over and over? Go from town to town fighting gym leaders while by some strange twist save the world as well?

And the fact that you can't join the evil side. WHAT THE HELL IS UP WITH THAT?!?!?!!?!!? I WANT TO BE IN TEAM ROCKET AND RULE THE WORLD! Not be some pansy-assed goody goody little brat who thinks he's somthing special. What about feeding pokemon actual FOOD? Pokeblocks? Poffins? Even if it says the pokemon have personality. Like Naive or Bashful. They don't. Their just weapons in your pointless quest to become champion of the pokemon league. Woopdy friggin doo. Sure I beat it, yeah, Then what? Hmm?

I liked gold and silver version. At least there, it was somewhat of a challenge and there was somthing after the League. Getting to go back to Kanto. And being able to go back and forth. What happened to that? Hmm? That was like THE best pokemon game EVER. Sure there was the cloning glitch. But that's not the point. The point is, Why continue going along the same storyline? Why not give us a world to explore, rather then a cliched storyline that always ends the same way. Becomming champion of the Pokemon League.

This is my rant. Thank you. Razz
_________________
I have two forces by my side,
One's the truth and One's a lie.
Which one's which I cannot tell.
This Enigma, is my Hell


Praise Lord Sheogorath, Prince of Madness and Lord of the Never-there!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skybait J
Consistent Gamer
Consistent Gamer


Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 388


Location: Doin' LAUNDRY

PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 12:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can't become evil and rule the world because the game is aimed at children! Do you want little kids trying to be evil and rule the world, hm? Razz

The other problem with Gold and Silver was an internal battery failure that ran the clock after seven or eight years. You were stuck on one time of day if you were lucky. If you were unlucky your game DIED!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
8-Bit
Crowned Gamer
Crowned Gamer


Joined: 20 Apr 2007
Posts: 54


Location: Chilly Beach

PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wasn't the show based off the game? Because the show followed the game, except it had a whole bunch of crap thrown in between each town, like the game.

If thats not what you mean then what do you mean?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Konoko
Capstone Gamer
Capstone Gamer


Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 273



PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

8-Bit wrote:
Wasn't the show based off the game? Because the show followed the game, except it had a whole bunch of crap thrown in between each town, like the game.

If thats not what you mean then what do you mean?


I think he means in the way that the show gave them personalities and such and there were more pokemon just around the world doing things, not always random encounters.
I suppose to extend the game to a more realistic, complete and open world, perhaps going beyond just taking turns using attacks in combat, perhaps jobs and such, or being able to get items in ways other than shops/item balls lying around. Like, say, training up a dugtrio and setting it to mine some cave for evolution stones?

Although, there is one other thing I can't help but pick at.
Quote:
if they had made it for a better console rather then DS then It'd probably be a damn cool game

I'm pretty sure if a game is bad, its bad, and changing what its being played on wouldn't really make it that much better...o.O


Last edited by Konoko on Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Onasaki
Crowned Gamer
Crowned Gamer


Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 63


Location: Anywhere.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The game was based off the show. The show aired in japan before the game was created. It was also a manga before it was a show, anyway.

The manga is much better then the Anime, but then arn't all Manga better then the anime?

Anyway going off topic with that.

Quote:
You can't become evil and rule the world because the game is aimed at children! Do you want little kids trying to be evil and rule the world, hm?


Really, your joking right? Lookit all the games there are now. All the violance. All the killing random things. Think about it. There's probably 1 or 2 8 year olds that play friggin Dead Rising, or Oblivion. Or Resident Evil for that matter. Hell, I knew a FIVE year old who played Resident evil. And knew what he was doing!

Come on! Alot of little kids play evil-related games. Trust me.
_________________
I have two forces by my side,
One's the truth and One's a lie.
Which one's which I cannot tell.
This Enigma, is my Hell


Praise Lord Sheogorath, Prince of Madness and Lord of the Never-there!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skybait J
Consistent Gamer
Consistent Gamer


Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 388


Location: Doin' LAUNDRY

PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Game DEFINITLY came first. Show and manga were based off of it. I mean, it went game-manga-show-other manga-toys-spin off shows.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pokemon

Quote:
Pokémon (ポケモン, Pokemon?, IPA: [ˈpoʊ.ke.mɑn]) is a media franchise owned by video game giant Nintendo and created by Satoshi Tajiri around 1995. Originally released as a pair of interlinkable Game Boy role-playing video games, Pokémon has since become the second most successful and lucrative video game-based media franchise in the world, falling only behind Nintendo's Mario series.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Captain Gamer
Digital Defender
Digital Defender


Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 269


Location: World Zero

PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

*cracks knuckles*

... Ow.

First off, I agree that beneath the commercialism, cartoonizing, (is that even a word?) IVs, EVs, hacking, and non-stellar plots, the Pokemon games are indeed full of depth and serious business. The main games are losing momentum a little bit, but I overall enjoyed the newest installment, Diamond and Pearl, since I didn't play it with intention of lampooning every aspect of it.

I also think that there is a lot that can be done with spinoff games such as Ranger, Snap (brilliant, brilliant game), and Mystery Dungeon. There is so much to do with the world of Pokemon despite catching them all, and each offers a unique experience... it's just a shame that people don't get that and just go for the titles that make them Pokemon trainers. Each to their own, and I personally say that spinoff games are very welcome. CONCEPT is hardly ever the problem in video games, it's how the developers follow through that really matters.

That said, I think that a game as a gym leader would require a LOT of work to make feaseable. I'd say something along the lines of spending the first half of the game earning the rank, then the second half uncovering some sort of league conspiracy. Now, gyms always seem to be themed, but remember the coup de gracie of Pokemon, Gold/Silver/Crystal, when Blue became the Viridian gym leader? His team remained balanced as far as types go, which means that it just so happens that gym leaders are themed, but not restricted to it.

It may sound groan-worthy, but 'evil organizations' were cool when they weren't two-dimensional. Team Rocket was awesome to battle against, but the other teams were just 'Evil evil evil wah ha ha oh no the Pokemon is destroying us all what have we done,' and it just KILLS me it came to that. What we need is a new team (or maybe breaking the 'Team' formula) that represents competence on the dark side and not just blind 'evil evil evil.'

Pokemon Mystery Dungeon, I am not fully familiar with, but I AM familiar with the 'Roguelike' genre it comes from. I have YET to play a Roguelike that I didn't like. I have played a little bit of Mystery Dungeon, and that combined with what I now about Roguelikes, and I can say that I definitely think it's a worthwhile title and will CERTAINLY make car rides go so much faster.

As for Mr. Onasaki's comment about Pokemon being 'weapons' for league domination, well of course! From puppies to hammers, anything can be means to a goal. How you treat these things is entirely up to who you are. You think you're all that and everything else is a rung in your ladder? Okay! Then your Pokemon are weapons! If you actually take the care to think of your Pokemon as living beings with feelings, okay! Then they are your in-game friends who are with you to the end! It really is a shame that they linked 'nature' to stats, though, since I think the additions of natures really lets the imagination go wild in how you think your Pokemon will act. They really need to work on making Pokemon have individual personalities, and less on how to fill up the game and how to make more money. Make the game more immersive, and the money will come naturally.

(Here's where I stop addressing Onasaki specfically and talk to you all again) If this makes you groan yet again, try suspending disbelief when thinking about Pokemon. If you see the games as commodities to be played, done with, shelved, and moved on to the next, then of course you won't see Pokemon as any more than weapons for your gain! If, however, you see the lush world of Pokemon for what it can be, immersive and full of intrigue, then you may more enjoy the company of your partners, and video games on the whole.

I must agree with Konoko in saying that the platform HARDLY dictates the quality of the game. Sure, there's different ways to play, but 'better' between a DS and a console game is a tough call to make. That aside, I WOULD like to see a main-series Pokemon game for the Wii or the next generation, simply because there is just so much that can go into it, and I would like to explore a map in polygons, not sprites like Onasaki said. It's an indulgence I can't help but to have.

I'm afraid that, despite the whole 'hero' thing, I must also give the debate of an evil-oriented game to Onasaki as well. As I said before, a concept concieved in competence is not automatically doomed. We'd just need the game done in a way that can adequately portray an evil organization outsidet the common bounds of black-and-white, perhaps have the protagonist be the same level-headed moral person we always are, yet he decided to join the dark side anyway. Better yet, rather than release two versions of a game where the only difference is which Pokemon and where, release two versions that have the same world, but different stories, one as a humble trainer and one as an organization member! Or going off the Hoenn saga, two different teams that the player could be part of! If we can have a Pokemon game as an evil team member that can portray it as more than evil for the sake of it or greed, I would certainly like to look into it. Gamefreak ought to grab off some of SquareEnix's scenario writers and the dialogue artists of the Paper Mario games and take the world of Pokemon away from the arrogance of the light and explore a more taboo side of a world filled with powerful monsters that are so easily tamed. Hopefully, even the children can learn that being bad is still not cool, but being a complete goody-goody magnetized toward the extremity of justice and the status quo just kills your right to freedom to think.

And that is MY rant. Razz Sans excessive use of jabs and harsh words.


_________________
Konoko wrote:
LOL GAMES R GAY. GAMES ARE TOTALLY LESBIANS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    gamerhang.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> Video Game Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum